Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology 310 10.31348/2024/6 Original article Diagnostic Importance of Oct Pachymetry in Keratoconus Benca Kapitánová Karolína https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9209-0223 Javorka Michal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-5193 Vida Rastislav Halička Juraj https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0234-3616 Králik Michal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-7637 Prídavková Zuzana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-6711 Žiak Peter https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3910-6174 1 2 2024 1 4

Purpose: To evaluate the value of AS OCT pachymetry as a method capable of detecting early differences between keratoconus, latent keratoconus and corneal astigmatism based on measurements of the parameters of corneal epithelial thickness and total corneal thickness. Methods: This study analyzed 162 eyes of 89 patients examined with a Zeiss Cirrus 500 Anterior Segment Premier Module. OCT Pachymetry maps were created in 97 eyes with keratoconus, 33 eyes with latent (forme fruste) keratoconus, and 32 eyes with regular corneal astigmatism (≥ 1.5 Dcyl). The parameters of epithelial thickness (central epithelial thickness in the 2 mm zone, paracentral epithelial thickness in the 2–5mm zone, minimal and maximal epithelial thickness) and total corneal thickness (S-I in the 2–5 mm zone, SN-IT in the 2–5 mm zone, minimal thickness, max-min thickness) were analyzed in all pachymetry maps. Results: Statistically significant differences were determined in 3 parameters of epithelial thickness (paracentral epithelial thickness in the 2–5 mm zone, minimal epithelial thickness, maximal epithelial thickness) between group A and group B (p < 0.001), as well as between group A and group C (p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were determined in 3 parameters of total corneal thickness (S-I in the 2–5 mm zone, SN-IT in the 2–5 mm zone, minimal thickness) between group A and group B (p < 0.001), between group A and group C (p < 0.001), as well as between group B and group C (p < 0.001). Conclusion: AS OCT Pachymetry maps are a reliable method capable of detecting differences between keratoconus and corneal astigmatism based on the comparison of paracentral epithelial thickness in the 2–5 mm zone, minimum epithelial thickness, and maximum epithelial thickness. Furthermore, based on the evaluation of the parameters of total corneal thickness, it is a method capable of defining the differences between keratoconus, latent keratoconus and corneal astigmatism (S-I in the 2–5 mm zone, SN-IT in the 2–5 mm zone and minimum thickness). In the statistical analysis, the most reliable parameters appear to be: the difference between groups A, B and C in the parameters S-I in the 2–5 mm paracentral zone, SN-IT in the 2–5 mm paracentral zone and in the values of minimum corneal thickness.

 anterior segment OCT keratoconus OCT pachymetry References Vazirani J, Basu S. Keratoconus: current perspectives. Clin ophthalmol. 2013;7:2019-2030. Studeny P. a kol. Keratokonus. Praha: Maxdorf. 2020. ISBN 978-80- 7345-665-8. Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2425-2433. Gokul A, Vellara HR, Patel DV. Advanced anterior segment imaging in keratoconus: a review: Imaging the keratoconic cornea. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46:122-132. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography: assisted topographic corneal epithelial thickness distribution imaging of a keratoconus patient. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2013;18:74-78. Lohmann CP, Resichl U, Marshall J. Regression and epithelial hyperplasia after myopic photorefractive keratectomy in a human cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:712-715. Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Gobbe M, et al. Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic LASIK as measured by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:444-450. Franco J, White CA, Kruh JN. Analysis of compensatory corneal epithelial thickness changes in keratoconus using corneal tomography. Cornea. 2019;39:298-302. Ramos JLB, Li Y, Huang D. Clinical and research applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography – a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37:81-89. Ellenhawi FM, Alzankalony YA, Abdellatif MK, Ibrahim AMT. Role of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus in comparison with the Pentacam. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;72:3712-3715. Ostadian F, Farrahi F, Mahdian RA. Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness map measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in healthy, subclinical and early keratoconus subjects. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019;8:85-91. Qin B, Chen S, Brass R, et al. Keratoconus diagnosis with an optical coherence tomography-based pachymetric scoring system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;9:1864-1871. Sella R, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN Afshari NA. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal epithelial thickness mapping with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and diseased cornea eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;197:88-97.