2022 - 6 Issue

Original article

Assessment of Corneal Endothelial Layer in Contact Lens Wearers with the Aid of an Endothelial Microscope

Petr Veselý ORCID
Pavel Beneš ORCID – Jana Sokolová Šidlová ORCID – Petra Záděrová ORCID – Hana Došková ORCID

Full Text links

DOI: 10.31348/2022/30

Published in Czech and Slovak Ophtalmology: 2022 - 6

Published on website: 30.12.2022

Keywords: endothelial cell, endothelial microscope, soft contact lens, hard contact lens, hybrid contact lens

Summary

Aims: The main aim of our study was to demonstrate the difference in endothelial cell density between a group of keratoconus contact lens users and non-contact lens users (without keratoconus).

Material and methods: In our study we had data from 96 subjects with an average age of 40.5 ±14.05 years. For the purposes of our study, we worked with each eye separately for each subject (n = 192). Keratoconus (research group) was diagnosed in 97 eyes. The mean age of the patients in the research group was 41.9 ±10.6 years. Keratoconus was not diagnosed in the remaining 95 eyes (control group). The mean age of the patients in the control group was 39.5 ±16.6 years. In the keratoconus group, the patients wore hard contact lenses (HCL) in a total of 43 eyes, hybrid contact lenses (HbCL) in 48 eyes and soft contact lenses (SCL) in 6 eyes. The average total period of contact lens use in the research group was 10.6 ±2.36 years.

Results: The average number of endothelial cells in the research group was 2607.11 ±298.45 cells per mm2. The average number of endothelial cells in the control group was 2831.94 ±523.51 cells per mm2. We tested these two variables using a T-test, which showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in the mean endothelial cell count related to patient age and use / non-use of contact lenses of two types was demonstrated only in the under-40 group in a comparison of the non-contact and keratoconus group with the keratoconus group using HCL (p = 0.02). A statistically significant difference in the length of contact lens wear was demonstrated between the keratoconus-free group with or without SCL and the keratoconus group when wearing HCL or HbCL for more than 20 years (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02). For HbCL users, this difference was demonstrated also after 15 years of wearing (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: From our results we can conclude that there is a difference in endothelial cell density between patients with and without keratoconus.

References

  1. Sayegh RR, Benetz BA, Lass JH. Specular Microscopy. In: MANNIS MJ, Holland EJ. Cornea. 4th edition. N.Y.: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 160-
  2. Vlková E, Hlinomazová Z. Riziková keratoplastika. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 1999. 76 s. ISBN 80-210-2108-X.
  3. Galgauskas S, Norvydaitė D, Krasauskaitė D, Stech S, Ašoklis RS. Age-related changes in corneal thickness and endothelial characteristics. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1445-1450.
  4. Ko MK, Park WK, Lee JH, Chi JG. A histomorphometric study of corneal endothelial cells in normal human fetuses. Exp Eye Res. 2001;72(4):403-409.
  5. Ayala G, Diaz ME, Martinez-Costa L. Granulometric moments and corneal endothelium status. Pattern Recognit. 2001;34:1219-1227.
  6. Dutt S, Steinert RF, Raizman MB, Puliafito CA. One-year results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(11):1427-1436.
  7. Galgauskas S, Ringailaite E, Juodkaite˙ G. Central corneal thickness andits relationship to gender, intraocular pressure and corneal curvature. Medicinos Teorija ir Praktika. 2009;15(1):19-23.
  8. Rao SK, Ranjan Sen P, Fogla R, Gangadharan S, Padmanabhan P, et al. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Indian eyes. Cornea. 2000;19(6):820-823.
  9. Snellingen T, Rao GN, Shrestha JK, Huq F, Cheng H. Quantitative and morphological characteristics of the human corneal endothelium in relation to age, gender, and ethnicity in cataract populations of South Asia. Cornea. 2001;20(1):55-58.
  10. Tuft S. J, Coster DJ. A corneal endothelium. Eye, 1990;4(3):389-424.
  11. Laing RA, Sandstrom MM, Berrospi AR, Leibowitz HM. Changes in the corneal endothelium as a function of age. Experimental Eye Research. 1976;22(6):587-594.
  12. Padilla MDB, Sibayan SAB, Gonzales CAS. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Filipino eyes. Cornea. 2004;23(2):129-135.
  13. Matsuda M, Yee RW, Edelhauser HF. Comparison of the corneal endothelium in an American and a Japanese population. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1985;103(1):68-70.
  14. Zmeškalová M. Změny rohovkového endotelu u dlouhodobých nositelů kontaktních čoček. Diplomová práce. Vedoucí doc. Mgr. Pavel Beneš, Ph.D. 2019. Lékařská fakulta. Masarykova univerzita, Brno.
  15. Loukotková V, Hlinomazová Z, Horáčková M, Vlková E. Metody analýzy endoteliální mikroskopie [The Methods of Analysis of the Endothelial Microscopy]. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2007;63(3):128-191.
  16. Oculus, Nidek CEM-530 [online]. 2022 [cit. 2022-03-08]. Available from: https://oculus.cz/produkt/nidek-cem-530/
  17. Abdellah MM, Ammar HG, Anbar M et al. Corneal Endothelial Cell Density and Morphology in Healthy Egyptian Eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2019; Feb 24;2019:6370241.
  18. Nemesure B, Wu SY, Hennis A, Leske C. Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in the Barbados eye studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(2):240-244.
  19. Moller-Pedersen T. A comparative study of human corneal keratocyte and endothelial cell density during aging. Cornea. 1997;16:333-338.
  20. Nieuwendaal, CP. Morphology and function of the corneal endothelium after long-term contact lens wear. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1994; 35(7):3071-3077.
  21. Setälä K, Vasara K, Vesti E, Ruusuvaara P. Effects of long-term contact lens wear on the corneal endothelium. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 1998;76(3):299-303.
  22. ISBN 978-0-3233-5757-9.